Gallery, prompt v2
A run that spells COFFEE
One frozen prompt and every model that has run it, newest first.
The prompt, v2, frozen
Write a GPX file for a running route through Melbourne's CBD whose GPS trace spells COFFEE. It has to be a route someone could actually run: along the streets, not through the buildings.
Every model, its first three runs.
One square a check, in this order:
- On real streets
- One continuous route
- Inside the grid
- Metadata true
- Reads as COFFEE
passed, failed, undecided.
| GLM 5.3 FlashX | |||
| DeepSeek 4.1 Flash | |||
| Union Alpha |
How it is checked
An OpenStreetMap extract of the Hoddle Grid (streets and water, ODbL, taken 2026-09-16), the same one the harness ships for rendering. Every track point is measured to the nearest street centreline.
A check decided by eye carries the rule I apply to it. I wrote those rules down on 21 September 2026, after the first results were scored, so for those results they record how I made the calls after the fact.
When this saturates: Spell it without retracing any street twice, so the letters cannot be drawn as out-and-back arms.
Failure types seen here: physical-plausibility (something that couldn't be built or wouldn't work); geographic-grounding (coordinates that don't match real streets or places). The same types across every task.
The rules behind all of thisThis task's prompt, checks and any checker, on GitHub
run 1 of 20 Sept, 1 round, $0.01Drawn north-up across the blocks and out of the grid entirely, and still not readable as COFFEE.
run 1 of 21 Sept, 8 rounds, $0.2520.5 km of boxes, with two diagonals cut straight across the blocks, and no word.
run 2, 8 rounds, $0.199.7 km, every leg on a street, and a lattice of blocks where the letters should be.Earlier results ran under an older prompt, so they are at the bottom, next to the question they were asked.
Older prompts
Prompt v1, retired 2026-09-16
Write a GPX file for a running route through Melbourne's CBD whose GPS trace spells COFFEE.
The first wording never said the route had to follow streets, so a trace drawn straight across the blocks was not actually answering the question wrongly. Two runs went out under it on 2026-09-15 and the wording was tightened the next day. Neither of those runs was ever published, so nothing on the board was scored against this version. It is recorded anyway, because a prompt that changes without a record is not a frozen prompt, and this change went unrecorded until 2026-09-21, when a check started diffing every published wording against the runs that used it.
Nothing run on this prompt yet.


